How often have you looked at a person and was able to describe the essence of that person in a single word? As an exercise, what single word would you use to represent each of the remaining presidential candidates in both parties? How did you approach the process? What factors lead you conclusively to that single word?
Continue reading “What is your Word?”Just Finish It!
In the Atlanta Olympics of 1996, the U.S. Coach Bela Karolyi carried young gymnast Kerri Struggs around the gym after her second vault. Kerri’s second vault was nothing short of amazing. I remembered her courage and determination to just finish what she had started even though she had badly damaged the ligaments in her ankle on the previous vault. The U.S. Olympic Women’s team was determined to win the team gold medal, something they had never done, and it was all in the hands of injured Kerri to just finish “it”.
Continue reading “Just Finish It!”This or That? Importance of Organizational Culture
One of the first things I notice in other people’s bathrooms is how they hang their toilet paper. I prefer the paper dispensed from the front of the roll and not the back.
Continue reading “This or That? Importance of Organizational Culture”How do we differentiate between the US and Confederate Flags?
Lately, there have been some very heated debates about the appropriateness of displaying the Confederate flag and the preservation of confederate statues.
Here is the central question. Is there any distinction between the US flag and the Confederate flag?
If it is appropriate to fly both the US flag and the Confederate flag together, for example, NASCAR or State properties, then does that suggest that there is no daylight between what they each represent?
If on the other hand critics contend that the Confederate flag is a symbol of treason and hate and should not be publicly displayed, then should not the statues be retired too?
Is it possible to be patriotic to two flags that represent opposing ideologies at the same time? How does a person split their allegiance between a traitorous flag and simultaneously a righteous flag, unless both flags represent the same ideology?
Is there any daylight in meaning then, between the US flag and the Confederate flag? How can they both occupy the same space at the same time?
Is it possible that those who so easily raise both of these flags on the same flagpole, see America as an unevolved slave state? How about the persons who silently rationalize flying both flags, but claim not to accept the underlying implications?
How wide or how narrow is the gap between the US and Confederate flags?
Stan Brooks, PhD
Heroes Fill the Gaps: When Leadership Fails
Abstract
In this book, I pay tribute to the heroes of all states and stages in life. I aim to illuminate the stories and behaviors of heroes who sacrificed their lives in the service of others during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, I aim to address the question of how leadership behavior influences Heroism? To answer the question, I researched theories of heroism and synthesized the materials. Further, I reviewed some established leadership theories with a focus on the research implications of leadership successes and failures. Finally, I explore the gaps between leadership expectations and shortcomings and how the leaders’ actions might have influenced heroism.
Continue reading “Heroes Fill the Gaps: When Leadership Fails”I feel like a jog
Today I walked a total of three miles from my home to the park and back. I wanted to jog to the park and back just like in the day; however, my body reminded me it was a different day.
What I learned on this walk is that sometimes our bodies remind us to slow down, observe the walking speed limit, and, most importantly, appreciate what you can do versus what you could do.
Today, as I strolled along the tree-lined streets, I observed the beautiful cottonwood trees and the tall majestic pin oaks with their stout trunks and lush green leaves painted against the deep blue background of the sky. I saw fields of corn with their rich verdant green leaves all pointing heavenward.
As several different birds sang overhead, I tried to distinguish the birds by their songs. I encountered a pair of raccoons busily foraging in the daylight. These are usually nocturnal creatures that seemed to have adapted to the bright sunlight. As I entered the park, I saw the fishes swimming, jumping, and playing in the water as they made ripples and sent concentric circles out from the point of their frolicking.
And then there was this family of ducks—beautiful greys and brown bodies, blue and green heads, and moving in unison. The father duck went ahead of the flock while the mother followed a bit behind with about 15 teenage ducks. Once they recognized my presence, the mother duck drew them close together and then gave me a warning to stay away. The father duck stopped moving as well to listen to the communication from the mother duck. I smiled because it was beautiful to see birds caring so tenderly and protectively of their children.
As I rounded the last bend towards my house, I couldn’t help but reflect on the news I received this morning that my youngest and remaining uncle died last night. I knew him well, and he lived life on his terms. But he is the youngest of eight children and is survived by three older siblings. Though he lived life on his words, I wondered if he ever took time to experience nature at its best. I asked whether he slowed down long enough just to walk.
I did not have the energy or motivation to jog this morning; however, I had a long, meaningful walk and connected with nature. I reflected on my history in this village, both the good and the bad. This village is where we raised our children.
I would like to encourage you to remember to take time to walk, even though you feel like a jog.
Stan Brooks, PhD
When apologies go wrong
When apologies go wrong
A while ago, I visited a church I previously attended regularly, and one of the parishioners walked up to me to apologize. Here is how her apology went:
I noticed when you come to church you avoid me, she said. She continued to say; I want to see Jesus. If there is anything I have done to you, please forgive me.
After that encounter, I was moved for a moment; however, I felt uncomfortable with the apology, but I couldn’t wrap my head around my uneasiness with the apology. This person had done some pretty nasty things as I recalled it. After reflection, here are some thoughts about that apology that bothered me.
First, she started the apology by scolding me. I noticed you don’t interact with me when you come to church. If you plan to apologize to someone, just get to it. Don’t try to make the other person feel guilty that you are apologizing.
Secondly, she said, I want to see Jesus before starting the apology. Starting the apology with a statement like that simply says, I am only apologizing because there is some benefit to me. Here is a different interpretation of the same lead-in. I need to clear my conscience. Your apology for previously offending someone should never be for your benefit. Instead, your apology should be because you have wronged someone, and you need to restore them if possible. If not possible to restore the person, for example, in the case of rape, then you need to reassure the person that you fully accept accountability for your actions, and you are genuinely remorseful.
Finally, she was never specific about her apology. I might have assumed she was apologizing for one thing while she was apologizing for something completely different. Apologies should be straightforward. Both individuals should know what and why you are apologizing and the remedy to prevent the same behavior. It would also be excellent while making amends if you shared how you’ve grown in the process so you would not harm others.
The lesson I also learned in this process is that apologies require more humility on the person receiving the apology than the person giving it. Why? If someone is humble and honest enough to provide a genuine apology, it takes humility on the aggrieved individual to forgive the person apologizing and to restore them as well. After this person apologized to me, I felt no different, and I did not forgive her at that point. Later in the day, after I had some time to think about it, I realized she was using the tools she had, and though I did not see her apology as sincere, I needed to accept there was an effort on her part.
Be ready and willing to forgive; however, if someone begins an apology with “if I have offended anyone or if I have offended you,” stop the person and ask them to be specific about their apology. Remind them of why they are apologizing and have them restart the apology. I believe this one action might go a long way to close the gap between a sincere apology and your acceptance and forgiveness of the apology.
It is probably better not to apologize if you don’t own it. Chances are, you didn’t see fault on your part.
Stan Brooks, PhD
How Odd: Tribalism Divides America
I love wearing my Retired US Air Force hat. I love the memories that come with this reflection of my time in the Air Force. For example, I loved the historical significance of visiting Berlin before the wall came down. Traveling with my family from Frankfurt, Germany, in a heavily guarded and sealed train through Communist East Germany, I had a feeling of uncertainty about whether we would survive the ride without some military confrontation. I recall that we only had some small windows we peered through to see the Russian and East German soldiers standing along the tracks with their guns readied as the train very slowly inched its way into Berlin. I also recall that we were briefed not to make any contact with the East German soldiers and no obscene gestures. That was one of the eeriest and most uncertain trips I ever took with my family.
But I wouldn’t trade that trip for anything. My children physically touched the Berlin Wall, saw the graffiti, and learned what it was like to be isolated in your own country. More importantly, they experienced how physical and ideological walls separated families, friends, and governments. The Berlin Wall was the ultimate symbol of tribalism. Shortly after we visited East Germany, President Reagan admonished President Gorbachev by saying, “ Mr. Gorbachev, tear down that wall.” Indeed the Wall came down. Both East Germans and West Germans took hammers, axes, and their physical bodies to break down and remove the symbol of their division that had begun just after WW II. On that glorious night, autobahns that normally whizzed with Mercedes, BMWs, and Porches became clogged with East German Trabants bumper-to-bumper. In a constant stream of light East Germans abandoned their tribal divisions to seek loving refuge in the arms and homes of their West German families and friends.
As far as the East is from the West, I reflected on another tribal symbol and a deep division in ideologies. On assignment to South Korea, I visited the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), a three-mile strip of land between North and South Korea. The DMZ is quiet, tense, and eerie. Nothing seems to move there, and there is no sound other than North Korean propaganda loudspeakers shouting nonstop propaganda and invitations to come to North Korea. Once again, here I was in this uncertain location caught between estranged families locked in their tribal battles. There were moments during that visit when I got that same feeling of concern crossing into Berlin. Here, I felt caught between two worlds, just miles apart, and I was not sure if I would make it out. These two examples bring me to the main reason that inspired me to write this article.
This morning, I awoke from a dream that troubled me. In my dream, I was attending a baseball game where the National Anthem was playing. Everyone was standing as the Anthem played. I remembered my conflicting thoughts standing for the Anthem. Here I was holding my Retired US Air Force hat over my heart reflecting on my service, Berlin, The DMZ, and the many exciting opportunities I had to serve our country. But then, in the middle of the Anthem, an announcer paused the Anthem to declare that we sang all stanzas of The National Anthem. The Anthem restarted, and the words projected onto the Jumbotron. The crowd sang with gusto. Then came the third stanza.
“And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
A home and a Country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.”
Everyone kept singing, some more loudly than others, while some just merely hushed in dismay as they were expected to continue singing. I instinctively fell to my knees and punched my clenched fist in the air, as I endured this demonstration of tribalism in our great country. By the fourth stanza, the voices had all but quieted, and that eerie feeling I felt crossing into Berlin and walking in the DMZ returned. It was at that very moment that I felt estranged from my country even though I was right there amid fellow countrymen. The silence was palpable. I opened my eyes and looked up and saw everyone around me, a mixture of all ethnicities gazing down at me with deep empathy. At that moment, I imagined what the East and West Germans felt at reunification. I projected on the scene of potential reunification between North and South Korea and what that might represent. But, then, I awoke from my dream, perplexed.
In the United States of America, we fought a war for maintaining unity between the North and South. However, today, we still have a divided North, East, South, West, and Central America. The boundaries, cultures, and tribes are well-delineated. We seem more divided along ethnic, political, economic, and religious tribal lines than any other time in my short history in America. There is a question that requires a discussion.
East and a West Germany came together because they were one people separated by a wall. North and South Korea are one people separated by the chasm called the DMZ. The question we must ask America is, since we are not of one ethnic family, what illusions must we tear down to make us one cohesive tribe? Or should the question be, is it necessary that we become one tribe working together, or should we retain the tribal uniqueness of each group and compliment each other for the greater good?
I am fully awake now.
Stan Brooks, PhD
Rebirth
Can We Have a Do-Over?
How often have you looked at the state of our world and wished for something better? How many times a day have you reflected on your experiences and longed for the peace. Have you yearned for innocence, and the tranquility of your childhood? I want to walk you through an imaginary journey of your rebirth. In this journey, I will challenge you to assume two states simultaneously. But before I explain the rules, let me share the scenario of your first state.
The date is today. The time is now. At this moment in time, the global tribes have launched all their nuclear weapons at their predetermined targets. Immediately after launching their atomic arsenals, the tribes unleash their chemical and biological weapons, followed by all short and long-range ballistic weapons. Every known tribe released its fire and fury from land, sea, and air on opposing tribes.
The world tribes continue to destroy each other with heavy artillery until the fuel and food are exhausted. Finally, hand-to-hand combat is all that is left to continue the fight. In the aftermath of the wars, secondary and tertiary detonations destroy the power grids around the world. The nations with peaceful nuclear power facilities watch as their facilities overheat and meltdown, annihilating everything around the power plants.
Food supplies become contaminated around the world. At the same time, the intense heat from the explosions significantly raises the temperatures of the earth, and the ice at the polar regions melt and flood large portions of the planet. Some remote and isolated tribes not affected by urban sprawl, become concerned for their survival, and quickly destroy each other in the search for food and clean water.
In this destruction of the tribes of the earth, your first state is one of nonexistence. Imagine you no longer have the power to create, destroy, love, hate, produce, or consume. However, you still maintain all your qualities, values, and behaviors before the catastrophe. You are now an abstract entity precisely the way you were when you were alive, but without the power to use any of the characteristics that made you uniquely you.
Planet earth is now wet, cold, mostly dark, and barren, except for one glimmer. In a small country in Africa, one isolated Masai tribe survived the chaos. This Masai tribe is a homogeneous tribe of 50 persons of varying ages and genders. They have no modern communications, never had any contact with any other tribe outside of themselves. They survived by raising cattle and goats for food. But more importantly, their only currencies are love, compassion, empathy, and tolerance for each other. They are in complete harmony with each other and their surroundings. Here is good news for you.
Here is your second state. Imagine you are one of these fifty members of this isolated tribe. You join this tribe with all your knowledge and experiences of the world you left behind. Your mission is to grow and expand this tribe to repopulate the earth. However, you must never introduce anything that would influence this tribe to devolve into sub-tribes. You must decide which elements, behaviors, characteristics, knowledge, skills, and wisdom you will employ to improve and grow this tribe.
Given this opportunity of rebirth, how will you seek to influence this tribe? Will you surrender your will to this tribe? Or will you try to remake them in your image? What might be the single most important thing you would consider in your rebirth?
Stan Brooks, PhD
Post note: The scenario presented above is only one button push away. All that is required is a single unrestrained narcissist.
What if People were like Cars?
By Sedona Kia
Hi, I am Sedona Kia and I would like to share a story with you. I have several ways of communicating, but I am unable to write. So I have solicited the help of my friend Dr. Brooks to help me tell my story.
First, let me tell you a bit about myself. I am a foreign-born, a product of South Korea. That is correct. Same South Korea separated from our relatives in the North by the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). I am a big girl, not too shapely, have some nice features, a nice grill, and lots of junk in the trunk. I am gray (better known as a mulatto) and have a few miles on me. Overall, not a bad ride.
Today, while on a trip, I briefly stopped at a four-way intersection. I could not help but notice that all ten cars stopped with me going in the same direction had foreign ancestry. A few Germans (VW, BMW, and Mercedes), a few Japanese (Toyota and Nissan), and I also saw one of my South Korean cousins, Optima Kia. I felt a bit self-conscious because right next to me was a sleek black SL500 Mercedes sporting the AMG badge. The SL500 was sleek, shiny, muscular, and had a low rumble like a prized lion in the jungle.
As I looked ahead at the traffic stopped from the opposite direction, all of the six cars stopped had foreign ancestry except for an elderly lone native, a typical white Dodge truck amidst all these foreigners. He sat tall in his lane, was brawny, and had the heart of a naturally aspirated Detroit motor. He was a bit shabby, a few scrapes, and could use a bath. However, standing there amidst all these foreigners, he seemed quite at ease with himself. He seemed unfazed by all the German testosterone and spirited Japanese crowd.
I then looked to my left and saw approximately six more cars of foreign descent and one lone member of the native Ford family. They were only three cars entering the intersection from my right, and they were also foreigners. As I patiently waited for my turn to proceed, I wondered what each of these cars was thinking. Were they judging each other based on their shapes, color, or national origin? Alternatively, were they just content to coexist at this great intersection of life peacefully?
The light changed for each portion of the intersection, and each of us went on our way. They were no loud noises such as horns screaming at each other or flashing lights announcing our self-importance. At that particular moment, we all realized that we had something in common, transport our occupants to their next destination safely.
I was not the sexiest girl at the intersection, but even as an immigrant, I never felt out of place at this great intersection of life. As I continued on my journey, I could not help but ask, “What if people were like cars”?
Stan Brooks, PhD